Impact Player Rule in IPL Sparks Debate: Shastri Backs It, Rohit Sharma Not So Sure

The IPL’s latest innovation, the Impact Player rule, has divided opinions within the cricketing world. While former Indian coach Ravi Shastri believes it’s a positive step for the game, current players like Rohit Sharma have expressed concerns.

Shastri, on R Ashwin’s YouTube channel, emphasized the need to adapt: “The Impact Player is good. You have to evolve with the times… It’s got tighter finishes, and you saw that in the last IPL.” He highlighted the rule’s potential for unexpected heroes, citing Dhruv Jurel, who transitioned from Impact Player to Test cricketer within a year.

He acknowledged the initial criticism but believes its value will become evident: “People will start re-looking at how they think about it” as players like Dhruv Jurel, who started as an Impact Player, go on to achieve success.

The rule, implemented on a trial basis in 2023, allows teams to name a 12th player who can replace anyone from the starting XI at any point during the match. BCCI secretary Jay Shah confirmed the rule’s impermanence, with a final decision on its future coming after the 2024 T20 World Cup.

“It’s not permanent,” Shah said, emphasizing discussions with stakeholders like players and broadcasters. “The biggest advantage is that two Indian players are getting a chance.”

Rohit Sharma, however, isn’t convinced. He, along with players like Axar Patel and Mukesh Kumar, feels the rule might hinder the development of all-rounders. Delhi Capitals coach Ricky Ponting echoed a similar sentiment, calling it a “nightmare” for coaches despite acknowledging its potential to enhance entertainment.

The debate surrounding the Impact Player rule highlights the constant push and pull between tradition and innovation in cricket. Only time will tell if it becomes a permanent fixture in the IPL or fades away as a fleeting experiment.

Impact Player Rule has Brought its Own Challenges

The Impact Player rule has certainly added a new dimension to the Indian Premier League. However, it has also sparked debate about balance in the game. The rule allows teams to bring in a 12th player at any point during the match, essentially giving them an extra weapon for specific situations.

This goes against the traditional view of cricket, which emphasizes a balanced contest from the outset with no mid-game alterations.

There are arguments that the Impact Player rule was inspired by substitutions in football. However, football is a fundamentally different sport.

The large number of positions, higher likelihood of injuries, and player fatigue due to the constant running justify substitutions. In cricket, the Impact Player disrupts the established strategy and can feel unfair, especially since fatigue isn’t as prominent a factor.

While Ravi Shastri may enjoy the increased entertainment value, the rule does raise concerns about fairness in cricket.