Michael Clarke Slams “Bazball” Origin Claim from Ben Duckett: Did England Invent Aggressive Cricket?
Michael Clarke, the former Australian captain, has reignited the debate surrounding “Bazball” approach from England, challenging claims that it represents a revolutionary shift in Test cricket.
While England’s aggressive tactics under Brendon McCullum have garnered attention and applause, Clarke argues that Australia has a long history of similar, high-octane batting, dating back two decades.
England’s mixed results, including failing to regain the Ashes and currently trailing India 2-1, haven’t dampened their enthusiasm for the attacking style.
Opener Ben Duckett even suggested their approach has influenced other teams, stating, “We almost feel like we should take some credit.”
These comments drew Clarke’s ire, prompting him to question Duckett’s historical knowledge. “He must have missed Australia for 20 years,” Clarke remarked, listing legendary Australian batsmen like Matthew Hayden and Ricky Ponting, renowned for their aggressive play.
“Just because you play a reverse sweep or a switch hit or a ramp shot, that doesn’t mean you are batting aggressively either,” he added.
While acknowledging his appreciation for England’s attacking spirit, Clarke emphasized, “They’re not the first.” He further solidified his point by saying, “Has he heard of Matthew Hayden, Michael Slater, Ricky Ponting, Damien Martyn, Adam Gilchrist? These guys used to smack it as good as everyone.
“Matthew Hayden just walked down the wicket and hit you straight over your head for a six. He didn’t have to play a ramp or a switch hit.”
Clarke’s intervention adds another layer to the ongoing discussion after Australian great Ian Chappell called “Bazball” a bullshit.
While England’s recent performances have undoubtedly brought renewed focus to aggressive batting, attributing its invention to them overlooks the historical context and contributions of other teams, particularly Australia.
Clarke is impressed with England’s approach to the game, calling it, “I love the aggressive approach of England … [but] England is not the first team to play aggressive or bat positively.”
However, he suggested that England aren’t first team to do it. In 2010s, Australia used to bat with same approach and pile up big runs, particularly in home conditions.
The debate is likely to continue, particularly as the England-India series progresses, offering further insights into the evolution and nuances of aggressive cricket in the Test arena.