Jadeja Family Feud Erupts: Father Makes Shocking Accusations Against Cricketer’s Wife

When cricketers become celebrities, unusual things are bound to happen and Ravindra Jadeja will consider it a good news what has been said by his father Anirudhsinh Jadeja.

Anirudhsinh Jadeja has accused his son’s wife Rivaba, of creating a rift within the family and isolating him from his son. Speaking to Divya Bhaskar, as reported by Sportskeeda, Anirudhsinh expressed deep regret over his decision to support Ravindra’s cricketing career, claiming it led to a strained relationship with his son and daughter-in-law.

Anirudhsinh, residing alone in Jamnagar, paints a picture of estrangement despite living in the same city as Ravindra, who reportedly lives in a separate bungalow. “We don’t call each other,” he laments, attributing the discord to Rivaba’s influence. “I don’t know what magic his wife has done on him,” he expresses, his pain palpable.

The accusations go beyond emotional detachment. Anirudhsinh alleges financial exploitation, claiming Rivaba pressured Ravindra to transfer assets to her name and accusing her family of being solely interested in the cricketer’s wealth.

“They are making merry now because they have got a bank,” he says bitterly, adding that he hasn’t seen his granddaughter in five years.

“Within three months of the marriage, she told me that everything should be transferred to her name. She created a rift in our family. She didn’t want the family and desired an independent life. I could be wrong, and Naynaba (Ravindra’s sister) could be wrong, but you tell me, how can all 50 members of our family be wrong?”

“There’s no relation with anyone in the family; there’s just hate. I don’t want to hide anything. We haven’t even seen the face of our granddaughter in five years. Ravindra’s in-laws manage everything. They interfere in everything. They are making merry now because they have got a bank,” Anirudhsinh further said.

Anirudhsinh’s outburst raises questions about the private lives of public figures and the potential complexities within families. His claims, if true, paint a disturbing picture of manipulation and isolation.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge the absence of Rivaba’s perspective in this narrative, leaving the full picture shrouded in ambiguity.